Understanding Responsible Research Assessment

A MacIntyrean Proposal

Authors

  • Cinzia Daraio Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
  • Sante Maletta University of Bergamo, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19272/202500701011

Keywords:

Research Evaluation, Responsibility, Virtues, MacIntyre

Abstract

Recently, research evaluation has undergone significant change, driven by the digitization of evaluation processes, the availability of data and the emergence of commercial
tools offering readily accessible indicators. Amidst this change, the concept of responsibility has emerged as a central theme. However, its precise meaning remains elusive. In our investigation, we adopt a phenomenological approach to elucidate the notion of responsibility as it pertains to research evaluation. Drawing inspiration from MacIntyre, we scrutinize research practices, examining
the challenges posed by external factors and the compartmentalization of social roles. This MacIntyrean philosophical framework, with its emphasis on virtues, allows us to shed light on the complexities of research assessment. Our work represents an initial examination contributing to ongoing debate about the future of research evaluation.

Published

24-03-2025

How to Cite

Daraio, Cinzia, and Sante Maletta. “Understanding Responsible Research Assessment: A MacIntyrean Proposal”. Acta Philosophica 34, no. 1 (March 24, 2025): 173–188. Accessed April 4, 2025. https://www.actaphilosophica.it/article/view/4633.

Issue

Section

Notes