The Modal-Epistemic Argument : Wintein’s Rebuttals Rebutted

Emanuel Rutten

doi:10.19272/202500701009

The Modal-Epistemic Argument : Wintein’s Rebuttals Rebutted

Authors

Emanuel Rutten VU University, Amsterdam, Netherlands

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19272/202500701009

Keywords:

Modal-Epistemic Argument, God, Personal First Cause, Wintein

Abstract

In a recent paper, Stefan Wintein criticizes my responses to the objections he raised to my modal-epistemic argument (MEA) for the existence of God. In this paper, I continue our debate and respond to Wintein’s criticisms of my previous responses. I argue that Wintein’s criticisms are unsuccessful. As a result, the MEA still stands.

Published

24-03-2025

How to Cite

Rutten, Emanuel. “The Modal-Epistemic Argument : Wintein’s Rebuttals Rebutted”. Acta Philosophica 34, no. 1 (March 24, 2025): 143–162. Accessed April 2, 2025. https://www.actaphilosophica.it/article/view/4639.