Sizeless Stretchable Souls

Substantial Form as Nature in Thomas Aquinas

Authors

  • Stephen L. Brock Pontificia Università della Santa Croce, Roma, Italia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19272/202500701004

Keywords:

Aquinas, Aristotle, Mereology, Medieval Metaphysics, Nature, Soul, Substantial Form, Universals

Abstract

Aquinas follows Aristotle in defining nature, taken strictly, as a thing’s primary intrinsic principle of motion and rest. He also identifies nature, so defined, with the essential makeup of its bearer, and chiefly with the substantial form. I sketch a rationale for this identification. A subtle but key thesis of Thomas’s regards the indivisibility of substantial form. He does not get the thesis from Aristotle. Its wording is Augustine’s, and its thought is largely Albert’s. But it seems to help clinch the aforesaid identification. I suggest that the history of the topic gives indirect support to this judgment.

Published

24-03-2025

How to Cite

Brock, Stephen L. “Sizeless Stretchable Souls: Substantial Form As Nature in Thomas Aquinas”. Acta Philosophica 34, no. 1 (March 24, 2025): 49–66. Accessed April 2, 2025. https://www.actaphilosophica.it/article/view/4724.

Issue

Section

Studies

Most read articles by the same author(s)